Archive for the ‘Arab-Israeli Conflict’ Category

Israel Asks Court for Delay in Demolition

Monday, April 30th, 2012

The homes of Israeli settlers in a West Bank outpost are on private Palestinian land and the Israeli government said last year the homes would be demolished by May 1. The government now requests a three-month delay in the demolition. A critic calls the request “an announcement of war … against the rule of law.” The announcement was condemned by the Palestinians and brought public criticism from both the European Union and the United States.

 

Do you think that what is being done is fair? How do you think the settlements will impact the hope for future peace between Israel and Palestine?

 

CNN

Israeli Military Chief Doesn’t Expect Nuclear Bomb From Iran

Thursday, April 26th, 2012

Benny Gantz, the Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. of the Israeli Military made a statement on Independence day to Haaretz News in which he said that he doesn’t believe Iran will go forth with the production of a nuclear bomb. In his opinion, the sanctions placed upon Iran will finally begin “to bear fruit”. The development of a nuclear bomb by Iran will limit “the freedom of action Iran will permit itself.” Ultimately this development will only create negative effects for Iran, the Middle East and the world, according to Gantz. The PM of Iran, Benjamin Netanyahu, is taking small steps to eventually get himself to a place where he can make the final decision on whether or not to develop nuclear weapons, but as of now he hasn’t taken the extra step. According to Gantz, this next year is very important because “the more the Iranians progress the worse the situation is.” Gantz has also assessed the Iranian nuclear facilities and says that they are “not bomb-proof.”

 

Do you believe that Gantz has made an accurate assumption about the Iranian nuclear program? What are some specific negative effects that will come of the development of a nuclear weapon?

 

See the story on BBC here

See the story on Haaretz here

Can There Be “Peace Without Partners”?

Tuesday, April 24th, 2012

That’s what three prominent Israelis suggest on today’s New York Times Op-Ed page:

Ami Ayalon, Orni Pertuschka, and Gilead Sher, “Peace Without Partners,” New York Times Op-ed piece, April 24, 2012

IME Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict

 

Israel-Egypt Gas Dispute

Monday, April 23rd, 2012

A dispute over delivery of Egyptian natural gas to Israel could have serious political and diplomatic consequences.

Story at BBC

IME Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict

 

 

Iran calls for global nuclear disarmament

Monday, April 16th, 2012

During the first round of talks between Iran and the world powers on Saturday, Iran declared that it wanted to work toward preserving its nuclear capabilities for civilian use only and also help to work toward disarmament. The Iranian negotiator suggested that “ Iran can serve as a successful precedent in the promotion of the motto “nuclear energy for all, nuclear weapon for none” for all other countries.” Iran’s cooperation is a welcome change considering its reluctance to hold talks in the past several months.

Do you think Iran is sincere in its declaration or is Iran simply buying the time it needs to secure a nuclear weapon? Is there a reason for the United States to be suspicious?

Press TV

A Chinese insurance company has stopped covering Iranian oil. On April 5th the China P&L Club announced that it would no longer insure tankers carrying Iranian oil. Sanctions set forth by the EU have impacted the way the Chinese receive their end of the oil trade; many Chinese importers of Iranian oil depend on European re insurers. As one of Iran’s most powerful allies, the fact that the Chinese have begun to walk away from the Iranians is indicative of the success that the sanctions will have.

Al-Jazeera 

Iran arrested the operatives of an alleged terrorist organization that they believe is sponsored by Israel. The group,  People’s Mujahideen of Iran (PMOI), is allegedly financed and trained by the Israeli secret service. Officials denied any US involvement, but one senior official confessed that the group had been privy to American intelligence reports.

BBC

 

 

 

ICC Rejects Palestinian Bid

Wednesday, April 4th, 2012

The prosecutor of  the UN’s International Criminal Court (ICC) has rejected a bid by the Palestinians for recognition, a step which would have allowed the Palestinians to bring war crimes charges against Israel before the War Crimes Tribunal at The Hague.

Story at the BBC

 IME Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict

Muslim Brothers Pressure HAMAS

Saturday, March 24th, 2012

Egypt’s new political leadership, dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood, is preparing to apply pressure to HAMAS to mend fences with rival Palestinian faction Fatah.

“The intervention in the Palestinian issue is the clearest indication yet that as it moves into a position of authority, the Brotherhood, the largest vote getter in Egypt’s parliamentary elections, intends to both moderate its positions on foreign policy and reconfigure Egypt’s.

Brotherhood officials say that they are pulling back from their previous embrace of Hamas and its commitment to armed struggle against Israel in order to open new channels of communications with Fatah, which the Brotherhood had previously denounced for collaborating with Israel and accused of selling out the Palestinian cause. Brotherhood leaders argue that if they persuade the Palestinians to work together with a newly assertive Egypt, they will have far more success forcing Israel to bargain in earnest over the terms of statehood.”

David D. Kirkpatrick, “Islamist Victors in Egypt Seeking Shift by Hamas,” New York Times, March 24, 2012

 

Will the Arab Spring Come to Gaza?

Wednesday, March 21st, 2012

Charlton Price, MH ’44, put us on to the following piece:

Sarah Mousa, “Is Tension Building Before a Gaza Spring,” Al-Jazeera.com, March 20, 2012

 

How and When Did the West Become Interested in the Creation of a Jewish State in Palestine?

Tuesday, March 20th, 2012

Western interest in dominating the affairs of geographical Palestine goes back as far as Alexander the Great, followed, of course, by the Romans and the Byzantines.  The Crusades (1095-1291) represent an exclusively European Christian attempt to dominate the region.

However, the yearning for a Jewish state with Jerusalem at its political and religious center begins, so Barbara Tuchman argued, with the translation of the Bible into English.  Her book, Bible and Sword. New York: Ballantine Books, 1984 (first published in 1956), posits the following points in the development of this yearning:

1.  Translation of the Bible into English in the 16th century.

2.  The growth of English (and French) mercantile interests in the Far East (by way of the Middle East), 16th – 19th centuries.

3.  Puritan interest in the restoration of Palestine to the Jews as the necessary precondition for the coming of the Messiah as foretold by the Old Testament prophets, 17th century onward: see especially such early expressions as that of Joanna and Ebenezer Cartwright, who in 1649, petitioned the British and Dutch governments to become the first and the readiest to transport Izraell’s sons and daughters in their ships to the Land promised by their forefathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob for an everlasting Inheritance.  Puritans believed that the second coming of the Messiah could occur only after the Jews had been restored to Zion.

4.  Patronage of Anthony Ashley Cooper, Seventh Lord of Shaftesbury in 1840.  He coined the slogan, “A land without people for a people without land.”

The dream crossed the Atlantic with the Puritan pilgrims and quickly became established in North America.  At this point, the best source on the history of the dream is Michael B. Oren, Power, Faith, and Fantasy: America in the Middle East, 1776 to the Present.New York: Norton, 2007.

Israel Condemned for Air Strikes in Gaza

Sunday, March 11th, 2012

Both Iran and the Arab League have condemned Israel for its violent crack down on alleged Palestinian militants through air strikes that killed at least 15 people, including half a dozen militants, on Saturday. Both the Arab League and Iran have asked for international support to “take a firm stance to dissuade Israel from its continued massacres and violations of the rights of the Palestinian people.”The Arab league claims that Israel is responsible for the protection of Palestinian people because it is an occupying force. The Israeli army claims that the air strike and raids were executed in response to the numerous firing of rockets from Gaza since Friday morning.

Hurriyet

Press TV

Do you think Israel’s attack on Gaza is an example of self defense or is it a blatant violation of human rights? Is the Israeli army justified in what they did?