Archive for the ‘Turkey’ Category

A Change in Leadership Within the Turkish Military

Friday, August 27th, 2010

While politicians in Turkey have always had to look over their shoulder at the military, times are changing. Yet, this change in leadership could signal future conflict between the ruling AK party and the generals.

Here’s the story from the NYTIMES

Lady Mary Wortley Montagu

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

Lady Mary Wortley Montagu (1689-1762) lived in Adrianople and Istanbul during which time her husband Edward served as British ambassador to the Ottoman Empire.  She stands out from much of Western travel literature for her sympathetic and admiring portraits of the people living in the places she visited. 

Here is an excerpt: 

To Lady Mar,       Adrianople, 1 April, 1717

“I wish to God, dear sister,  that you were as regular in letting me have the pleasure of knowing what passes on your side of the globe as I am careful in endeavoring to amuse you by the account of all I see that I think you care to hear of. You content yourself with telling me over and over that the town is very dull. It may possibly be dull to you when every day does not present you with something new, but for me that am in arrear at least two months news, all that seems very stale with you would be fresh and sweet here; pray let me into more particulars. I will try to awaken your gratitude by giving you a full and true relation of the novelties of this place, none of which would surprise you more than a sight of my person as I am now in my Turkish habit, though I believe you would be of my opinion that ’tis admirably becoming. I intend to send you my picture. In the mean time accept of it here…

As to their morality or good conduct, I can say like Harlequin, that ’tis just as ’tis with you,  and the Turkish ladies don’t commit one sin the less for not being Christians. Now that I am a little acquainted with their ways, I cannot forbear admiring either the exemplary discretion or extreme stupidity of all the writers that have given accounts of them. ’Tis very easy to see they have more liberty than we have, no woman of what rank so ever being permitted to go in the streets without two muslins, one that covers her face all but her eyes and another that hides the whole dress of her head, and hangs half way down her back and their shapes are wholly concealed by a thing they call a ferace which no woman of any sort appears without. This has straight sleeves that reaches to their fingers ends and it laps all round em, not unlike a riding hood. In winter ’tis of cloth, and in summer plain stuff or silk. You may guess then how effectually this disguises them, that there is no distinguishing the great lady from her slave, and ’tis impossible for the most jealous husband to know his wife when he meets her, and no man dare either touch or follow a woman in the street.

This perpetual masquerade gives them entire liberty of following their inclinations without danger of discovery…Upon the whole, I look upon the Turkish women as the only free people in the Empire. The very Divan pays a respect to them, and the Grand Signor himself, when a pasha is executed, never violates the privileges of the harem(or women’s apartment) which remains unsearched entire to the widow. They are queens of their slaves, which the husband has no permission so much as to look upon, except it be an old woman or two that his lady chooses.  ‘Tis true, their law permits them four wives, but there is no instance of a man of quality that makes use of this liberty, or of a woman of rank that would suffer it. When a husband happens to be inconstant, as those things will happen, he keeps his mistress in a house apart and visits her as privately as he can, just as ’tis with you. Amongst all the great men here I only know the tefterdar (i.e. treasurer) that keeps a number of she-slaves for his own use (that is, on his own side of the house, for a slave once given to serve a lady is entirely at her disposal) and he is spoke of as a libertine, or what we should call a rake, and his wife won’t see him, though she continues to live in his house.

Thus you see, dear sister, the manners of mankind do not differ so widely as our voyage writers would make us believe. Perhaps it would be more entertaining to add a few surprising customs of my own invention, but nothing seems to me so agreeable as truth, and I believe nothing so acceptable to you. I conclude with repeating the great Truth of my being, dear Sister, etc.”

Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. The Turkish Embassy Letters. Malcolm Jack (ed.). London: Virago Press, 1994. pp. 69-72

Turkey’s Military Losing Ground to the Islamist Government

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

Some are saying Ataturk is rolling in his grave: the strict secularist political culture he instituted in Turkey has been steadily losing ground over the course of the last decade to Turkey’s ruling Islamist AKP  (Justice and Development  Party – Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi ).

The Economist, “Turkey’s Military: No Jobs for the Boys,” Aug. 12, 2010

More on Turkey

“Modern Turkey” – a photo essay

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

This series of photographs of Turkey, taken by George Georgiou are stirring and though-provoking. there are interesting questions posed in the short summary as well, such as where is globalization leading us to?

http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/20/george-georgiou-in-turkey/

Where Does Middle Eastern Sectarian Intolerance Come From?

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Sami Zubaida tells us that in the late Ottoman Empire (19th century), Jews, Christians, Freemasons, and Muslims lived together, with exceptions to be sure,in an atmosphere of harmonious cosmopolitanism.  So, what went wrong?  Zubaida blames Arab nationalism and a renewed sectarianism that accompanied it. 

Go to article at OpenDemocracy.net

Turkey Theatens to Break Off Relations With Israel

Monday, July 5th, 2010

Turkey is threatening to break off diplomatic relations with Israel.

Story at the BBC

BBC analysis

Why Turkey is Embracing Iran

Monday, June 14th, 2010

“Part of Turkey’s motivation in reaching out to Iran is based in realpolitik. Iran is Turkey’s neighbor and also supplies the country with a fifth of its natural gas.

The approach is also part of a broader policy of economic and political integration in the region that Turkey, under Mr. Erdogan, has pursued for nearly a decade. Iranians can travel to Turkey without a visa, as can Syrians, Iraqis, Russians and Georgians. More than a million Iranians travel to Turkey on vacation every year. A Turkish company built Tehran’s main airport.”

Sabrina Tavernise, “For Turkey, An Embrace of Iran is a Matter of Building Bridges,” New York Times, June 13, 2010

More on Turkey

Turkey to Set Up Free Trade Zone With Some Arab Countries

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

Turkey has agreed to set up a free trade zone with Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan.

Story at BBC

Stephen Kinzer Writing on Turkey’s Kurds

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Stephen Kinzer, who lives in Turkey and is the author of Crescent and Star: Turkey Between Two Worlds (revised and expanded edition), one of the texts for the Fall, 2010 Islamic Middle East course, has an article on Turkey’s Kurds in the June 2010 issue of Smithsonian

Excerpt: 

“Still, everyone I met- even the most outspoken Kurdish nationalists- told me they wanted their homeland to remain part of Turkey Traveling across the country it’s easy to understand why Turkey is by most standards the most democratic Muslim country- a powerful, modern society with a vibrant economy and extensive ties to the international community. If the mainly Kurdish provinces of the southeast were to become independent, their state would be landlocked and weak in a highly volatile region- a tempting target for powers such as Iran, Iraq or Syria. ‘We don’t want an independence that would change borders,’ says Gulcihan Simsek, mayor of a sprawling, impoverished borough of Van called Bostanici. ‘Absolute independence is not a requirement today We want true regional autonomy to make our own decisions and use our own natural resources, but always within the Turkish nation and under the Turkish flag.’”

Go to article via ProQuest and the NMH Virtual Desktop

Study guide for Kinzer text (from the 2008 IME course syllabus)

Israeli Commandos Storm Gaza Aid Ships at Sea

Monday, May 31st, 2010

At least nine aboard the ships were killed including some Turkish aid workers prompting swift condemnation from Turkey. 

Story and analysis at BBC.

Below are related items published in the days following the initial raid: 

UPDATE from the BBC – June 1, 2010

UPDATE from Joshua Mitnick at the Christian Science Monitor: “Why Israelis Are Upset…”, June 1, 2010

UPDATE from Mark Landler. “After Israel Raids Flotilla, U.S. is Torn Between Allies,” New York Times, June 2, 2010: the two allies being Turkey and Israel.  Many of the aid activists killed or captured by the  Israelis aboard the ships were Turks.  The Israelis are saying they had tried to avert the confrontation by asking the ships to dock at Ashdod, outside the Gaza Strip, where, again according to the Israelis, the humanitarian goods were to have been offloaded and transferred to Gaza. 

But, it is clear from what the activists said prior to the event that they sought a confrontation to raise the profile of Gaza’s humanitarian crisis.  The New York Times faults Israel for botching its handling of the affair — see the June 2, lead editorial, “Israel and the Blockade.” 

Writing on the Op-Ed page of the June 2, 2010 issue of the New York Times, Israeli novelist Amos Oz (“Israeli Force, Adrift on the Sea”) says:

“But Hamas is not just a terrorist organization. Hamas is an idea, a desperate and fanatical idea that grew out of the desolation and frustration of many Palestinians. No idea has ever been defeated by force — not by siege, not by bombardment, not by being flattened with tank treads and not by marine commandos. To defeat an idea, you have to offer a better idea, a more attractive and acceptable one.

Thus, the only way for Israel to edge out Hamas would be to quickly reach an agreement with the Palestinians on the establishment of an independent state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip as defined by the 1967 borders, with its capital in East Jerusalem. Israel has to sign a peace agreement with President Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah government in the West Bank — and by doing so, reduce the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to a conflict between Israel and the Gaza Strip. That latter conflict, in turn, can be resolved only by negotiating with Hamas or, more reasonably, by the integration of Fatah with Hamas.”

The official Israeli position on the incident came with an Op-Ed piece in the June 3, 2010 issue of the New York Times by Israeli ambassador to the United States, Michael B. Oren, “An Assault, Cloaked in Peace.”

Abdul Rahman al-Rashed, a leading commentator in the Arabic press, sees some rays of hope in this crisis: “This is Also an Opportunity For Moderates,” June 3, 2010, Al-Arabiya News Channel.

This affair is the latest in a series of setbacks in Turkish-Israeli relations.  Go to the Turkey archive in this blog for more.  See also especially an article from The Economist dated 31 October, 2009 at this post.

The June 5, 2010 issue of The Economist features a “leader” on page 13 entitled “Israel’s Siege Mentality (go to article via ProQuest and the NMH Virtual Desktop).  The magazine asks the question, what would happen if Israel were to lift its siege of Gaza?  -

“How should Israel handle an authoritarian movement that refuses to recognise it and has in the past readily used terror? One answer is to ask the UN to oversee the flow of goods and people going in and out of Gaza. That is hardly a cure-all, but Hamas would become the world’s problem neighbour, not just Israel’s. The Arab world must do more, pressing Hamas to disavow violence, publicly pledge not to resume the firing of rockets at Israeli civilians and revoke its anti-Semitic charter. The West, led by Mr Obama, should call for Hamas to be drawn into negotiations, both with its rival Palestinians on the West Bank as well as with Israel, even if it does not immediately recognise the Jewish state. It is still the party the Palestinians elected in 2006 to represent all of them. None of this will be easy. But the present stalemate is bloodily leading nowhere.”

On pages 31-33 of the same issue, The Economist describes how Israel is playing right into the hands of HAMAS and HAMAS’ aim of tightening its hold on Gaza (go to article via ProQuest on the NMH Virtual Desktop).

On June 10, 2010 in a New York Times  Op-Ed piece (“Israel Without Clichés”), Tony Judt takes aim at cliches and other kinds of shoddy thinking about the Arab-Israeli Conflict.

In late June, Turkey tightened up on Israeli overflights of its territory — Professor Juan Cole explains.

More on HAMAS

IME Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict