Archive for the ‘PA-NMH Reflections’ Category

Just Like Mahmoud, I am Entitled to My Own Opinion

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

Bennett Carroccio

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/03/07/ahmadinejad.afghanistan/

“Iranian president: 9/11 was ‘big lie’”

Ever since I first joined our Middle Eastern History class, my father recommended that I remain completely unbiased in the classroom in order to see fully all perspectives at hand regarding Iran and specifically the American war on terrorism in Afghanistan. I feel as if I have done so- not letting my conservative views get in the way of what Mr. Drench has presented to our class as the facts. Unfortunately, I fear that this method has expired, for the time being, not because there is one more class left in the term, but because emotions, as I finished reading this article, has currently gotten the best of me.

Yesterday, March 6th, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called the 9/11 attacks a “scenario and a sophisticated intelligence measure” and a “big lie intended to serve as a pretext for fighting terrorism and setting the grounds for sending troops to Afghanistan.” Even if I was inclined to take this moron seriously, is he trying to tell the world that the American government was willing to kill thousands of its own people and put its most valued city in a state of total chaos and disarray, just for an excuse to attack Afghans?

I was raised in Westchester, now reside in Manhattan and am currently playfully involved in a Facebook “poking war” with my friend from home who was left fatherless after the 9/11 attacks in New York City. I am livid right now. Sam was right, Ahmadinejad is a nut job and is in no way qualified to be a leader on a national scene. He is the President of not just any country, but one that for the past couple years has had a universal spotlight shining on it. As a nation’s President, or any political leader for that matter, there are just certain things you do not do, this being one of them. This is his second offense, his first being his denial that the Holocaust ever happened and his claim that Israel should be erased off the map. How about America nukes Tehran, killing thousands of innocent Muslims and others, with Ahmadinejad watching, and then have our President in a few years issue a statement telling Iran: “There was no such thing as the‘Tehran Cataclysm.’ If you ask me, Iran shouldn’t even be a country.”?

Iranian President Ahmadinejad will visit Afghanistan tomorrow. An American cannot kill him, for that will likely spark lethal tensions between Iran and the United States. What I dream of, is that Gen. McChrystal has a chance to talk to Mahmoud, and sends him to the ground with a haymaker. Some people just deserve to get physically beaten.

“NATO Countries in Uproar Following Gates ‘Inexperience’ Comments”

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Bennett Carroccio

Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000236 EndHTML:0000004734 StartFragment:0000002473 EndFragment:0000004698 SourceURL:file://localhost/Users/Bennett/Documents/Phillips%20Academy%20Andover/Middle%20Eastern%20History/Blog%20Post%20%234.doc

My previous post begged the question of how our military forces should fight the Taliban. Apparently, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, along with the rest of the United States military, knows of the proper methods towards counter-insurgency warfare, but feel as if their NATO allies, the most prominent being Britain, the Netherlands and Canada, do not. Mr. Gates said to an American newspaper: “I’m worried we’re deploying [military advisers] that are not properly trained, and I’m worried we have some military forces that don’t know how to do counter-insurgency operations.” The Dutch reacted by calling forth the IS ambassador in the Hague and asking for an explanation while Patrick Mercer, a British Conservative MP and former British army officer called the statement: “Bloody Outrageous” and proceeded and to explain Britain’s importance in the war.

Is the fact that Robert Gates is “calling out” our allies saying something about our war efforts in Afghanistan? Being that I am only a senior in high school, I lack certain knowledge and skills regarding the understanding of human nature and actions. I have, however, been able to recognize specific trends, thanks to my athletic teams I have played on, for how certain people respond to certain situations, one being adversity and/or failure. Especially with our hockey team this year, I have noticed that when things are not going as planned, people always seem to focus their energy on the team’s faults and weaknesses out of frustration. By openly criticizing allied countries, is Robert Gates acknowledging that American and NATO efforts in Afghanistan are not going well/ are we losing (in whatever way Mr. Gates considers to be losing)? If people are pointing fingers and the American public sees these actions as I do, there will probably be more efforts from the citizens to want America to pull out from Afghanistan. As we discussed in class today, that is exactly what the Taliban is waiting for- foreign countries to leave Afghanistan.

A Dangerous Enemy

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Bennett Carroccio

In preparation for our Role Play earlier this week, I watched a Frontline video called “Behind Taliban Lines” when Afghan journalist Najibullah Quraishi was given permission to video tape the Taliban Central Group for fourteen days but was kicked out after ten. In these ten days he videotaped virtually everything- making roadside bombs, regular interactions between the insurgents, how they went about their days, how they communicated to one another during missions and even interviews Afghan village people from towns run by the Taliban. He even went with the insurgents on a mission where after road side bombs would go off the men would raid the vehicles right on the main road. The plan fell apart when the remote for the roadside bomb was not working. What worried me most, for NATO’s sake, is the insurgents’ commitment towards their cause.

How do we beat armed militants who think that fighting foreign countries is a task given from God in order to clear their land of the corruption and rottenness brought by the Western thinking, non-believing countries, like America. These men do not only seem willing to die, but also seem as if they want to die in efforts towards martyrdom. A group of men before a mission were telling the camera that they expect to die within the next couple of days, but then when referring to why they were dying one proudly asked: “What more do you want?” Later during that mission, things seemed to not be going well, so the commander at the base stated over the phone:  “Stop acting like you are caring about your life.” The men also believe that since they drove the Soviets out of Afghanistan, they could also do so with America, which seems to them to be a weaker enemy.

Not only are these men dangerously committed, but they also seem to have the support of the people from the small towns that Kabul has no power over. The insurgents obtain a great majority of their weapons from the townspeople, who buried weapons from when Afghanistan was fighting the USSR. The people, who are providing the terrorist groups with weapons, according to an interview with a townsman, prefer the Taliban over the Afghan rule. The man expressed that he, along with the others, felt that Kabul would “abuse” them that the Taliban provided a stable government and treated the people better.

How should the United States h0andle these men, who are virtually fighting martyrs? On a much personal level, how does a soldier fight someone who has little regard for his own personal wellbeing?  It seems almost unfair for the American soldiers to be fighting such enemies if they are, in fact, as committed as they claim they are.