Archive for the ‘Women’ Category

Iranian Woman Still Faces Murder Charges

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

In 2006 Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani was convicted of both adultery and the murder of her husband.  She was recently sentenced to be stoned to death, but the controversial nature of this decision sparked international disapproval. Iran has formally confirmed that the sentence has been suspended, but Ms. Ashtiani still faces murder charges. While in prison she was tortured and forced to make a video confessing to the murder.  Jose Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission, described the stoning sentence as “barbaric beyond words” and stated that it had “no justification under any moral or religious codes.” The current charges against her could still lead to death by hanging or a term in prison.

Question for the class: Why would Iran give such a harsh punishment when there is not enough evidence to prove Ms. Ashtiani is guilty?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/09/world/middleeast/09stoning.html?_r=1&ref=world

Robert Fisk on Honor Killings

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

Robert Fisk (we watched a video interview with him last week) has a two part series on honor killings this week in The Independent, a practice that ends the lives of 20,000 women per year at current rates.

Part 1 – “The Crime Wave That Shames the World”  (9/7)

Part 2  – “Relatives With Blood on Their Hands” (9/8)

Mixing of the Sexes in Saudi Arabia

Monday, September 6th, 2010

Our discussion in class this morning about the absence of a central religious authority in Islam and the resultant proliferation of fatwas and counter-fatwas comes at a time when such questions have risen again in Saudi Arabia:

The Economist.com, “The Politics of Fatwas: You’re Either With Us or Against Us,” Sep. 3, 2010

Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah attracted attention last year by appearing in a photograph with a group of women attending a conference.  See: Lara Setrakian, “Saudi King and Crown Prince Photographed With Women,” ABC News.com, May 3, 2010

How Accurate Are Some Leading Conceptions of Islam?

Saturday, August 28th, 2010

Malise Ruthven, in a review of recent books by Paul Berman and Ayaan Hirsi  Ali, questions some of the governing assumptions about the nature of Islam that both authors replicate in their work:  equating Islamist movements with fascism (Berman) and seeing Islam as inherently patriarchal (Hirsi Ali). 

“Obsessed as they are with their model of a ‘totalitarian threat’ to Enlightenment liberalism, both Berman and Hirsi Ali fail to take account of well-documented facts that would challenge their presuppositions. Berman muddles kin-patronage politics, a constant in Arab societies, with fascism. Hirsi Ali—oblivious of changes in gender roles that are occurring within more developed Muslim polities, and ignoring the way that traditional systems of authority tend to oppress women in cultures as different as China, Japan, and India—confuses Islam (a malleable religious tradition) with patriarchy (a specific set of social relationships built around masculine power). As Julien Benda himself might acknowledge, a failure to look at all the facts, however complex they may be, is a kind of intellectual betrayal, a trahison des clercs.”  [trahison des clercs = to score political points at the expense of intellectual integrity]

Ruthven offers some compelling reasons why the “Islamist = fascism” equation is inadequate: 

“Herein, I would suggest, lies the fallacy of treating the Islamist movements with all their complicated ramifications as a ‘totalitarian’ ideology in the same category as Nazism and communism, with dissenters such as Hirsi Ali viewed as ‘persecuted intellectuals’ comparable to the heroic refuseniks of the cold war era. Granted that Islamism contains fascistic elements (to which I myself have drawn attention), it is dangerously simplistic to assimilate the complexities of family power rooted in clan politics and kin patronage networks of a traditionally based society to a system comparable to that which operated in Russia from 1917 to 1991 or Germany during Hitler’s Third Reich.

The inadequacy of the ideological model of ‘Islamic fascism’ that Berman adopts in both Terror and Liberalism and The Flight of the Intellectuals was revealed by Paul Bremer, George W. Bush’s viceroy in Iraq, when he made the disastrous decision to abolish the Baath Party in 2003, precipitating a sectarian war that wreaked an appalling human cost. Bremer was explicit in making a Berman-like comparison between Baathism and Nazism. ‘Just as in our occupation of Germany we had passed what were called ‘de-Nazification decrees,’ he told PBS’s Frontline, ‘the model for the de-Baathification was to look back at that de-Nazification.’”

Berman is Bremer’s intellectual companion, his ideological fellow traveler. Despite a smooth delivery that gives an appearance of sophistication, he suffers from the same anthropological illiteracy that has proved catastrophic in Iraq and now—increasingly—in Afghanistan, where US and NATO policymakers seem to have difficulty in grasping the complex, clan-based nature of the insurgencies they face. “

Malise Ruthven, “Righteous and Wrong,” The New York Review of Books, Aug. 19, 2010, p. 88

Lady Mary Wortley Montagu

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

Lady Mary Wortley Montagu (1689-1762) lived in Adrianople and Istanbul during which time her husband Edward served as British ambassador to the Ottoman Empire.  She stands out from much of Western travel literature for her sympathetic and admiring portraits of the people living in the places she visited. 

Here is an excerpt: 

To Lady Mar,       Adrianople, 1 April, 1717

“I wish to God, dear sister,  that you were as regular in letting me have the pleasure of knowing what passes on your side of the globe as I am careful in endeavoring to amuse you by the account of all I see that I think you care to hear of. You content yourself with telling me over and over that the town is very dull. It may possibly be dull to you when every day does not present you with something new, but for me that am in arrear at least two months news, all that seems very stale with you would be fresh and sweet here; pray let me into more particulars. I will try to awaken your gratitude by giving you a full and true relation of the novelties of this place, none of which would surprise you more than a sight of my person as I am now in my Turkish habit, though I believe you would be of my opinion that ’tis admirably becoming. I intend to send you my picture. In the mean time accept of it here…

As to their morality or good conduct, I can say like Harlequin, that ’tis just as ’tis with you,  and the Turkish ladies don’t commit one sin the less for not being Christians. Now that I am a little acquainted with their ways, I cannot forbear admiring either the exemplary discretion or extreme stupidity of all the writers that have given accounts of them. ’Tis very easy to see they have more liberty than we have, no woman of what rank so ever being permitted to go in the streets without two muslins, one that covers her face all but her eyes and another that hides the whole dress of her head, and hangs half way down her back and their shapes are wholly concealed by a thing they call a ferace which no woman of any sort appears without. This has straight sleeves that reaches to their fingers ends and it laps all round em, not unlike a riding hood. In winter ’tis of cloth, and in summer plain stuff or silk. You may guess then how effectually this disguises them, that there is no distinguishing the great lady from her slave, and ’tis impossible for the most jealous husband to know his wife when he meets her, and no man dare either touch or follow a woman in the street.

This perpetual masquerade gives them entire liberty of following their inclinations without danger of discovery…Upon the whole, I look upon the Turkish women as the only free people in the Empire. The very Divan pays a respect to them, and the Grand Signor himself, when a pasha is executed, never violates the privileges of the harem(or women’s apartment) which remains unsearched entire to the widow. They are queens of their slaves, which the husband has no permission so much as to look upon, except it be an old woman or two that his lady chooses.  ‘Tis true, their law permits them four wives, but there is no instance of a man of quality that makes use of this liberty, or of a woman of rank that would suffer it. When a husband happens to be inconstant, as those things will happen, he keeps his mistress in a house apart and visits her as privately as he can, just as ’tis with you. Amongst all the great men here I only know the tefterdar (i.e. treasurer) that keeps a number of she-slaves for his own use (that is, on his own side of the house, for a slave once given to serve a lady is entirely at her disposal) and he is spoke of as a libertine, or what we should call a rake, and his wife won’t see him, though she continues to live in his house.

Thus you see, dear sister, the manners of mankind do not differ so widely as our voyage writers would make us believe. Perhaps it would be more entertaining to add a few surprising customs of my own invention, but nothing seems to me so agreeable as truth, and I believe nothing so acceptable to you. I conclude with repeating the great Truth of my being, dear Sister, etc.”

Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. The Turkish Embassy Letters. Malcolm Jack (ed.). London: Virago Press, 1994. pp. 69-72

West Bank Settlement Rabbi Bans Women From Running for Public Office

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

Story at BBC

New Book by Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Sunday, May 23rd, 2010

Deborah Solomon interviews Ayaan Hirsi Ali in today’s (May 23, 2010) New York Times Sunday Magazine.

Go to interview

Go to a review of her new book, Nomad: From Islam to America by Tunku Varadarajan in The Daily Beast.  Excerpt:

“Hirsi Ali ends her book with some muscular suggestions: ‘The Muslim mind needs to be opened. Above all, the uncritical Muslim attitude toward the Quran urgently needs to change, for it is a direct threat to world peace.’  She proposes an ‘Enlightenment Project,’ in which public education and social policy in the West is ‘geared toward grooming citizens, not preserving the separateness of tribe, the sanctity of faith…’ Western feminists, who too often allow the Muslim suppression of women to go unchallenged, must take it upon themselves to embrace the emancipation (from Muslim men) of Muslim women.”

UPDATE — June 14, 2010:  Pankaj Mishra reviews this book in the June 7, 2010 issue of The New Yorker (pp. 68ff.).  Excerpt:

“The sad truth is that the problems she blames on Islam–fear of sexuality, oppression of women, militant millenarianism–are to be found wherever traditionalist peoples confront the transition to an individualistic urban culture of modernity. Many more young women are killed in India for failing to bring sufficient dowry than perish in “honor killings” across the Muslim world. Such social pathologies no more reveal the barbaric core of Hinduism or Islam than domestic violence in Europe and America defines the moral essence of Christianity or the Enlightenment…The anarchic vivacity of contemporary Muslim societies–featuring such figures as Ali Saleem, Pakistan’s cross-dressing television host, and Cairo’s hijab-wearing sex therapist Heba Kotb, whose talk show is beamed across the Arab world–does not quite match Hirsi Ali’s description of an incurably medieval people busy devising ever-harsher laws for themselves while plotting mayhem for the infidels. In recent years, Islamist movements, led or assisted by women activists, have helped democratize Indonesia and Turkey; innumerable Muslims, such as Asma Jahangir, in Pakistan, and Shirin Ebadi, in Iran, fight to defend the rights of women against both Islamic fundamentalists and secular autocrats. ”

Go to the review via ProQuest and the NMH Virtual Desktop

More on Ayaan Hirsi Ali

See also

France One Step Closer to Banning Burqas

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

Yesterday (5.11.2010), France’s National Assembly unanimously (434-0, with 30 Communist members abstaining)  passed a non-binding resolution banning the wearing of the full Islamic face veil. 

Story at Deutsche-Welle

More on Muslims in Europe

Review: Two New Books About the Muslim World

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

(via ProQuest and the NMH Virtual Desktop) — The Economist, “Islam’s Many Hats,” May 8, 2010, p. 85

The books:

Vali Nasr, Meccanomics: The March of the New Muslim Middle Class. Oneworld

Isobel Coleman, Paradise Beneath Her Feet: How Women are Transforming the Middle East. Random House

Excerpts from the review:

“Islam looms large, sometimes terrifyingly so, in the West’s vision of the Middle East. Westerners are apprehensive as they see secular-minded democrats losing ground to Islamic fundamentalists. This anxiety, greatly sharpened by the attacks on America in 2001, the “war on terror” and all its consequences, has led to many seeing any public expression of Islam as a threat. Two new books by Vali Nasr, an Iranian-American academic, and Isobel Coleman, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, offer a welcome challenge to such fears. Neither author disregards the danger posed by extremists (underlined this week by the attempted car-bombing in New York). But they insist on a careful distinction between piety and fundamentalism, and present a nuanced view of Islam’s role in public life that is cautiously hopeful.

The battle against religious extremism, writes Mr Nasr, will be won by the rising Muslim middle class. Change will come about through free trade and integration into the global economy, not by sanctions or military action. The region will not turn away from Islam but remain piously conservative, probably misogynistic too. Secularism’s appeal has been tarnished by the region’s many autocratic regimes–and Middle Easterners have countless reasons to resent the West and its attempts to impose its own style of political reform…

Ms Coleman makes the case for Islamic feminism. Far from oppressing women, Islam endows them with plenty of rights; the problem lies in implementing those rights. Riffat Hassan, a Pakistani-American, argues that though the Koran treats women with respect, centuries of patriarchy have turned them into chattels. She and other Islamic feminists believe that by fighting for women’s rights within Islam, using the very same texts and doctrines that have proved so oppressive, women may be able to push through reform without being told that they have been indoctrinated by Western infidels.”

 

A Frenchman Argues for Banning the Burqa

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

A timely piece in light of our discussions in class the past two days appears on the Op-Ed page in today’s New York Times:

JEAN-FRANÇOIS COPÉ, “Tearing Away the Veil,” New York Times (Op-Ed piece), May 5, 2010

SUPPLEMENT:  Thanks to Deenie for calling our attention to an article about a Muslim cleric in Paris named Hassen Chalghoumi who also thinks the burqa should be banned:

Steven Erlanger, “For a French Imam, Islam’s True Enemy is Radicalism,” New York Times, Feb. 12, 2010

More on Muslims in Europe